FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideo

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy

4G backhaul--an opportunity and a dilemma - page 2

Tools

Previous page

IP is the answer

While most agree that IP is the ultimate answer, carriers still face questions about who provides what type of infrastructure. Traditional wireline carriers, many of which own mobile carriers, generally provide the leased TDM lines and could deliver packets over new fiber infrastructure built to the cell towers. The problem, economically speaking, is that mobile carriers are hesitant to give business to wireline competitors when operating outside their footprint.

"I've heard the phrase ‘no checks for LECs' said about this marketplace," said Salman. "The options outside the footprint are limited, but I'd have to say I think they consider the ILEC more of a mortal enemy than the [local] cable guy."

Cable is targeting mobile backhaul by pulling fiber from a residential hybrid/fiber coax (HFC) node directly to a cell site. The traffic is then backhauled over that fiber to the node and back to the cable headend. The cable infrastructure runs fiber deep into a neighborhood and close to a cell tower.

"They have a pretty good point-of-presence, obviously. They can run a lot of fiber out to cell towers or fairly close proximity so it's a good adjunct to their businesses," Hunt said.

Copper-based packets over existing infrastructure are more problematic, but can work if the copper is bonded, said Dyck, who proposed bonding as "a transition step so you can start off with some backhaul infrastructure and then swing over to the Ethernet port on the backhaul."

Dyck also likes using bonded DSL because "the reliability of the (DSL) network for residential services is just as high if not higher than a business service. In some cases they're primed for mobile backhaul service as well."

Wireless in the mix

Finally, there's wireless--which can range from conventional microwave, which is wildly popular in Europe and sparse in the U.S., to licensed and unlicensed wireless spectrum, to millimeter wave systems.

"There's a lot of work and a lot of innovation in terms of packet-based microwave to run native packet as well as TDM traffic and beef up the bandwidth," said Hunt, pointing to microwave links of 800 megabits to a gigabit and moving up to 3-plus gigs. "You're definitely going to see a lot of microwave backhaul."

In fact, as the cell backhaul space expands and demand grows, "you're going to see all four (wireless and wireline options) playing together," Hunt said.

In the end, a combination of economics and network needs will probably provide the best answer.

"There's going to be such a rush to turn up these systems that in the end whoever gets them fiber at the cheapest price is what makes the business model work," concluded Salman.

Previous page

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceWireless Email Newsletter:

Comments (2) | Post a comment
More stories about wireless spectrum   Wireless Backhaul   Mobile Carriers   Hybrid Fiber   Cell Tower   backhaul  

Comments

Around here (central TX) I'm pretty sure all the heavy-hitters on the cellular side use wireless backhauls for bandwidth. With T1s running around $600, a licensed wireless link provides needed bandwidth at a coast that isn't too bad.

You can tell when a given provider (like cricKet) just has a single T1 to their tower; you can do EvDO Rev. A over it but it's easy to see the backhaul congestion.

As far as cableco-based fiber goes, I'm not sure whether any cellular carriers use it here, but I know the city does (Time Warner Cable). Interestingly enough, the fiber internet routing appears to be completely different than residential cable, even though they're on the same AS. *shrug*

One thing I do know is that pricing for cableco fiber around here is aout $100 per Mbit. Cheaper than a DS3 or T1 from a wwireline operator, that's for sure.

As for DSL, the ILEC hasn't upgraded the lines in years so DSL is impossible in most locations (oddly enough, the ILEC is Verizon, famous for FiOS in other areas, which they're using for cell tower backhaul in some situations). Though I know Alltel has used DSL to backhaul some of their towers, and plenty of fixed wireless ISPs use DSL for backhaul. Bonded DSL can actually crank out some nice download speeds, though uploads are less exciting.

One thing I hope is true: if DSL is being used to backhaul communications from a tower there had better be some sort of backup available. DSL generally has much less rigorous SLAs than T1 circuits or the like...

I know for a fact that these wireless operators are eating up Cable MSO's fiber all over. They are turning over hundreds of towers per month to Cable MSO's. The price is unbeatable and as this article pointed out, the fiber presence Cable MSO's have is ideal for this application.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 30 + 7?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.