Free Newsletter
With the dawn of the superphone, where is Microsoft? Page 2
There are a number of reasons IDC believes Microsoft has not yet had that iconic device:
1. What the key players listed above have in common is control: control of the device and the operating system. RIM, Apple and Palm all own both the OS and device and deliver an integrated experience. Nokia has spun off Symbian as a non-profit entity, yet the integration of Nokia and Symbian is akin to any of the three device makers and its OS. Microsoft, however, must work with all of its device manufacturers and although the company certainly has influence, each device vendor has its own sets of priorities and a growing number of devices and operating systems it is working on. Unlike the PC, the mobile device is a much more personal device, where the hardware design, look and even color play a role in customer's buying decisions
2. Technology may also play a role here. Apple, Palm and RIM have delivered capacitive touch devices, while Microsoft's key touchscreen devices from HTC are the older resistive touch technology. The experience makes a difference in the end-users' hand.
3. Cost may be a factor. With RIM, Apple and Palm, the device manufacturers own the operating system. Symbian is now a free license as is Android and other Linux operating systems. And while Palm may still license its webOS to other device manufacturers, today, Windows Mobile remains as a mobile operating system where an ODM must pay for the license. In challenging economic times this may be a differentiator. In addition, ODMs must make decisions around how many and what operating systems they will support and cost may be a factor in how many devices they launch with a particular OS. Android, for example, as a fee free OS seems to be garnering a growing number of device makers for multiple devices.
Despite not yet having a superphone, Microsoft is still in a strong market position. Windows Mobile is currently third in the world with 13% share in IDC's Converged Mobile Device market (behind Symbian and RIM's BlackBerry OS) and has about 95% share of the Ruggedized Device market.
Microsoft is also fully aware of not having a flashy device that can stand up to the icons in the market today. Expect to see something from Microsoft in the near future. Likely manufacturers are Samsung or LG. Samsung has had feature phones that have pre-sold more than a million devices, including the Samsung Ultra Touch (1.8 million devices pre-sold) and the soon to ship Samsung Jet (that incidentally is the first feature phone to support Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync and pre-sold 2 million devices). LG, also a key Microsoft ODM, is known for delivery of devices with strong user experiences and attractive UIs and form factors. The challenge in working with vendors such as LG and Samsung will be the need for Microsoft to preserve the distinctive user interface that both companies use to differentiate.
Stephen Drake is the program vice president for Mobility & Telecom research at IDC. In this position, he has responsibility for the Mobile Enterprise, Mobile SMB, Mobile Device coverage, IP Communication Services and also contributes to IDC's Unified Communication research. Visit IDC.com.
Comments
Windows mobile is still much stronger in the business and enterprise space than the press is willing to recognise - and it is because they are capable devices. Our employees need to synchronize with a Sybase database. The only current client is on Windows Mobile with the iPhone client coming soon, but no sign of WebOS or Android. Screen resolutions of 480x800 are now standard on new WinMo systems, while 320x480 seems to be the maximum on the capacitive touch devices. This makes a huge difference to map viewing, web pages and remote desktop. While it ain't hot, WinMo still has a lot going for it.
As an avid 20 year fan of Microsoft, and a PDA user since the very early HP handhelds through Dell Axim 51v and a HTC Tilt WinMo 6.1 I am eagerly awaiting of my iPhone 3Gs on 7/10. It's intuitive and exciting user experience far surpasses WinMo by orders of magnitude. Maybe in 2 years or so, I might revert, but Microsoft is stuck in the starting gate as the race as already been won.
I've used Palm, RIM and WinMo devices and keep coming back to the RIM platform. However, with the new Toshiba TG01 Snapdragon platform, I can see myself going back to the WinMo device.
Well, get yourself a HTC TouchPro2, load SPB Mobile Shell 3 on it and there you have a WinMobile Ueberphone, far superior to Apple's product.



Comments (4) | Post a comment