Free Newsletter
The mobile broadband conundrum
Last week AT&T Chief Executive Randall Stephenson told the Wall Street Journal that wireless operators aren't prepared for the onslaught of data traffic coming from smartphones, and that the deluge is beginning to clog their networks.
Hence, the operator made several announcements around network improvements: an upgrade to a faster form of HSPA with theoretical downlink speeds of 7.2 Mbps starting later this year, an LTE deployment in 2011, a doubling of the amount of 850 MHz wireless spectrum used for 3G in most metropolitan areas, more cell sites, and an increase in bandwidth at cell sites.
AT&T desperately needs more bandwidth as iPhone users have inundated its existing network with data traffic. Moreover, the operator is positioning itself as the smartphone leader and will aggressively subsidize laptops this summer across the U.S., moves that only will increase traffic.
"I feel like we are closing the gap on this, but we're not there yet," Stephenson said at the D: All Things Digital conference hosted by the Wall Street Journal. "We are about to see these issues manifest themselves industry-wide."
Right now, AT&T appears to be combating the problem by imposing strict data caps with punitive overage charges. More recently, AT&T has found itself defending its network policy that prompted place shifting technology developer Sling Media to remove 3G access from the iPhone edition of its SlingPlayer Mobile video application. AT&T said the application would take up too much network capacity. SlingPlayer for iPhone enables users to stream live and recorded television content from their home entertainment system to their mobile device. In order to earn approval for the application, Sling Media was forced to disable 3G streaming capabilities, meaning iPhone users can only view content over WiFi. The same is true for Skype's iPhone application; it only works over WiFi.
Last week, I moderated a webinar on this very issue. John Jackson of CCS Insight, Larry Socher from Accenture and Adrian Hall from Bytemobile discussed how operators can effectively manage the deluge of data traffic. (You can check it out here.) The consensus was that LTE will solve most of these problems as the technology features a low cost per bit, thereby keeping operators from hitting the 3G wall where data traffic grows faster than revenues.
In fact, Hall quoted a study from Macquarie Capital that indicates if data usage continues to grow, the higher usage will drive beyond profitability within five years. So the challenge is: How do operators control cost and remain competitive while building new revenue streams?
Operators appear to be tackling the conundrum in a variety of ways. Jackson pointed to the many RFPs floating around for femtocells as a way to offload data traffic. And there appears to be much interest in charging variable rates for broadband such as pricing based on peak and off-peak. Indeed, Bytemobile conducted a survey of major global companies in conjunction with The Economist and found about 56 percent of the respondents saw variable pricing as a promising source of revenue. The webinar audience had similar feelings (see this chart).
Enhanced QoS also could be another powerful charging mechanism. Socher pointed out that operators should target strategic vertical markets. Customers of mission-critical applications in the enterprise, for instance, are more willing to pay a premium for QoS capabilities, he said.
This is no doubt a painful new world for mobile operators, but it appears that lots of vendors are coming up with lots of creative ways to ease the pain until LTE arrives. But which ones will operators choose? --Lynnette
Comments
Don't confuse AT&T's response to the Sling iPhone app and the Skype app. One is about excessive data usage. The other is about voice minute cannibalizing.
How is it that in Europe you can get a 15 GB cap for $20/month, or a completely unlimited plan for $70/month (without a contract)?
Do you honestly expect us to believe that the 4 major wireless carriers, who all have the *exact same plans, prices, and caps*, aren't colluding to maximize profits?
When someone like AT&T's chief executive says "I feel like we are closing the gap on this, but we're not there yet," it's incredibly obvious he's posturing for public support. These companies have the money, but don't want to spend anything to upgrade their networks to support higher bandwidth usage.
What we really need is deregulation of the market, allowing for some *real competition* to enter. Enough of this garbage collusion.
Grow up. What knowledge are you privvy to that the SEC and the FCC are not?
You must be kidding about the FCC & SEC. All knowing, all fair, all insulated from conflicts of interest ? Have YOU BEEN OBSERVING ?
The gent brings up a valid point by using comparison from a market that is orders of magnitude smaller. Remember "Economies of Scale" ?
Nice question, for the cheap pile of rhetorical ones.
The SEC ? Worldcom, Global Crossing, Tyco....et.al.
The FCC ? Log jam...Failure Comprehending Conflicts (of Interest).
Thanks for the lesson...er..whatever.
I have an iPhone 3G, and so does my girlfriend, (we are on a family plan) and we only use 3G in poor reception ares during calls to each other, and when getting apps from the app store. Since both 3G and use of safari & app store drain the battery, we use them as little as possible. Since we all ready pay a per line premium plus 20 dollars for text i refuse to accept any kind of caps. I think free texting or 10 dollar texting should be an option for iPhone 3G users. Voice takes so much more bytes than texting ever could. Or how about a 15 dollar discount when you have 2 phones & unlimited texting.
- A



Comments (5) | Post a comment