FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideo

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy

Netbooks vs. smartbooks: what are the similarities and differences?

Tools

The Intel world coined the word "netbook" to describe a slimmed-down notebook computer based on its Atom processor that is designed to use more software and applications in the cloud than on the device. The term netbook implies there is wide-area wireless onboard in addition to WiFi. However, some netbooks on the market are more like notebooks with hard-disk storage, and some have solid state storage for longer battery life.

Intel is counting heavily on netbooks to drive WiMAX sales for companies such as Clearwire, but so far the vast majority of netbooks are not WiMAX-capable, though they are sporting wide-area broadband on UMTS/HSPA networks (AT&T and T-Mobile USA in the U.S.) or EV-DO Rev. A networks (Sprint Nextel and Verizon Wireless in the U.S.). The HP netbook being sold by Verizon Wireless contains a Qualcomm chipset that provides wide-area broadband for both technologies and covers all of the U.S., European and Asian systems--it is truly an almost-anywhere-you-go netbook.

Intel will not have this space to itself for very long. One of the new chipsets designed by Qualcomm over the last couple of years is a full-blown, 1-GHz processor known as Snapdragon. This chipset is a direct competitor to the Intel Atom, and it will be showing up in a number of "smartbooks" (as opposed to netbooks). It is at this point in time that the two worlds collide.

We will have netbooks with embedded wireless built by computer companies, and smartbooks with computer power built in from the wireless side of the fence. It will be interesting to see which side captures the most market share and how these machines develop over time.

According to the Qualcomm website, smartbooks are designed to augment, not replace, notebooks and/or smartphones. Embedded wireless will include 3G mobile broadband, Bluetooth and WiFi. They will have GPS capabilities as well as 3D graphics, HD video and a full Internet browser, and they will be instant-on. They will weigh less than 2 pounds, be less than 20 mm thick (0.787 inches), and have eight hours of battery life with week-long standby time. Other smartbook attributes will include an intuitive interface, a sizable high-resolution display, an easy-to-use touchscreen, customizable operating systems and optimization for Web applications.

We will have to wait awhile for the first smartbooks to hit the shelves before we can check them out to see if they meet all of these objectives. However, from what I understand, they will, and they will come not only in the typical clamshell form factor with larger screens, but in more compact touchscreen tablets, and we should start seeing them in the fall.

It appears as though there will be some major differences between various versions of netbooks as well as between versions of smartbooks. Some of these devices will have solid state storage, which means they won't have as much storage as your desktop computer, but if you are OK with using the Internet for storing your data and applications, and you trust the wired and wireless connections, this probably will not be a big issue for you. If it is, there are some devices that have hard drives, but battery life will not be as good as with the solid state drive systems.

Perhaps the biggest difference I see in these two classes of products is that it looks like all of the smartbooks will be instant-on, while only some netbooks will be instant-on. Running Windows XP will still require waiting for the system to boot unless it is kept in standby, but other operating systems, including Linux, will provide instant-on capabilities. The importance of this is that these devices are likely to be used more during the day when users don't have the time to wait for a system to boot up in order to access their email or other information. These devices are not the first of what used to be called sub-notebooks or ultra-mobile PCs to provide instant-on capabilities. In the 1990s, many companies, including HP, released what would today be called netbooks using the Windows CE operating system, which permitted instant-on access to applications and information. I think instant-on is one of the most important features I will take into account when considering a purchase of either a smartbook or a netbook and it appears that smartbooks will all be instant-on. The next consideration will be what applications they run. I'm certainly not going to try to deal with file compatibilities across operating systems.

How many of us will carry wirelessly-enabled netbooks or smartbooks? How many devices will we carry and how often? Today I carry a smartphone (BlackBerry) all of the time and take my notebook with me when I will be away for more than a one-day trip, and only if I need to create work while I am away. My notebook weighs less than 3 pounds, has a battery life of 4 hours or more, a DVD reader/writer, 160-GB hard drive, and is fully synced to my desktop so I have every file I need with me, and it has Bluetooth, WiFi, and wide-area broadband.

Will I purchase a smartbook or netbook and then have three devices? If I must have two or three separate subscriptions for wireless access, one for each device, I probably will stick with my notebook for a while, at least until there are new pricing models or I come to trust having my data and applications in the "cloud," which I don't completely trust at the moment.

These products are "tweeners," and looking at the specifications, it is clear that smartbooks offer much better battery life than netbooks so far, but the rest of the comparisons will have to wait until we are able to test drive both classes of devices side-by-side. My final question is whether the iPhone and phones designed after it have changed people's perception of whether they need one of these new devices. Time will tell.

Andrew Seybold is an authority on technology and trends shaping the world of wireless mobility. A respected analyst, consultant, commentator, author and active participant in industry trade organizations, his views have influenced strategies and shaped initiatives for telecom, mobile computing and wireless industry leaders worldwide. www.andrewseybold.com

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceWireless Email Newsletter:

Comments (4) | Post a comment
More stories about Wireless Broadband   Verizon Wireless   Qualcomm  

Comments

I hate to point out something so obvious, but the term Netbook was coined long before this level of device was sporting WAN connectivity.

The beginning of the term spawns from Psion's netBook offering but was really thrust in the limelight when in 2007 Asus launched the EeePC.

Today, Netbooks are basically thinner, lighter, and less costly laptops containing only a hard disk and without the extra spindle (DVD/CD). Since most are networked (at the office or home) there is really no need for an internal spindle drive.

I'm now a consultant, but having worked in the PC arena for years, one thing is certain. 10 years ago, if I would have taken the concept of shrinking the screensize and weight to sub-3 pounds so I could sell the product at 1/4 to 1/2 the price of a corresponding Pentium Class laptop, I would have been fired.

This proves one thing. We've been overbuying PCs as consumers for years. Buying them based on software that "will come". And today, yesterday has caught up with tomorrow. Most people don't need more power than a Netbook will provide. And at $150-400, we certainly can make better use of our money by viewing the Netbook as a disposable laptop...use it for one or two years and upgrade.

Netbooks, notebooks, tablets, and palm-tops (Palm Pilot, Handspring, Newton) are all device classes that have shown their use in the marketplace. Now you want us to coin yet another phrase: "smartbooks".

well, I'm not sure the difference between a Smartbook and Notebook, and where is the line of demarcation between a Netbook and Notebook begin. Is it price? Is it the DVD? Is it the processor? Well, who knows for sure except "those guys" who want you to buy yet another device.

What we really need is this:

Dev 1: Small Form factor - Handheld
Dev 2: Medium Form factor - Laptop
Dev 3: Large Form factor - Walltop/Desktop

Dev 2 and Dev 3 will be equipped to "house" Dev 1. Dev 1 and Dev 2 will remain personal, while Dev 3 will be shared (meaning, accepts any Dev 1). Without Dev 1, Dev 2 and Dev 3 will only run/play local content.

This setup enables me to subscribe to one ubiquitous signal provider with multiple content providers (application/media).

Don;t just waste the precious energies branching too much into redundant half cooked solutions and alienate users.

I think, with the current state of the vendors in the race, there doesn't seem to be a fixed end goal (finish line), as they seem to be running all over the place. They don;t seem to have a clue what the market needs are.

As users/consumers/advisers/consultants we need to be clear on what we need to see, so the race can be clearly defined and judging the winners becomes easier.

This is one point that we will all agree that Barry West is right on. That is the model for access will become account oriented instead of device oriented. Subscribers will not pay 3 times for the same access. Imbedded modems will not become mainstream with a per unit price for access. Nor will products with imbedded modems increase beyond laptops. It sure would be nice to have a modem in my Nikon camera so I can send a pic to my parents of the kids. But I, and most others, will not pay 60 bucks a month for that device alone.

Having owned an OQO 02 with EVDO for a year, the advantages of having a computer which can be stuck in your pocket and still has the capability of running corporate applications is too often underestimated or overlooked.

Given the technology available when I purchased it, I sacrifice a great deal of speed versus a laptop or desktop, but the convenience of having the computer with me because it is as easy to carry as a cell phone makes up for it.

If the new generation of processors and chipsets will provide phone and PC capabilities with all day standby battery life for the phone and (combined with Win7) moderate processing power for the PC, I'd be more than happy to consolidate my plans and devices.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 14 + 7?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.