FierceWirelessFierceWirelessEuropeFierceDeveloperFierceMobileContentFierceBroadbandWirelessFierceVoIPFierceIPTVFierceTelecomFierceOnlineVideo

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy

Paid vs. free: which business model prevails?

Tools

Social networking holds potential

When it comes to business models, the discussion usually breaks into a debate over paid vs. free LBS apps. Two of the major navigation software companies that supply navigation technology to the Tier 1 carriers in the United States--Networks In Motion and TeleNav--believe that the consumer will pay for LBS apps and that the paid model will prevail. However, analysts say that third party applications will keep the big vendors and the major carriers on their toes. The application must "really have an impact on someone's life," said Frank Dickson, an analyst at In-Stat. "It turns into real money when people get those bills at the end of the month."

Sal Dhanani, TeleNav's co-founder and executive director of marketing, said that his company continues to see strong growth in paid apps. "We see clear willingness to pay. There is no need to have that downward pressure in the near- or mid-term future, unless some big disruption happens."

And for free applications to thrive, developers are going to have to find a way to get their application supported by hundreds of devices, a proposition that isn't cheap. According to Steve Andler, vice president of marketing for Networks In Motion, getting an application to work across numerous devices requires a multimillion-dollar effort that the stereotypical three guys in a garage working on an application simply do not have.

"Much like the California gold rush," he said, "there are going to be a few people who hit a vein and strike it rich, but then the big mining companies are going to come in and take it all over."

Nevertheless, Brent Iadorola, an analyst at Frost & Sullivan, believes that free applications--such as Google's offerings, Nokia's Navteq offerings or other location-based applications outside the carriers' purview--will be a threat to the traditional premium offering business model. "I think what you'll see longer term, more consolidation in this space," he said. "Some of the more innovative application providers merge or get acquired by some of the bigger players."

Carriers - the giant in the room

Social networking holds potential

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceWireless Email Newsletter:

Comments (2) | Post a comment
More stories about Tier 1   TeleNav   Navteq   Location based services   GPS   Google  

Comments

The most successful free integrated navigation and local search application is called amAze GPS (www.amazegps.com). And it works on most phones. It works better than most PND devices and the bauty of it is that you never have to buy maps - they are provided on demand, wherever you are.

Another major stumbling block for free LBS is the fact that carriers lock down GPS hardware on their phones. I have an AT&T BlackJack II on which the GPS is deactivated unless I use Telenav. Google maps works perfectly, provided I am using and paying for Telenav. In my experience Telenav isnt worth 10 dollars a month, however having access to my phones GPS is. (even if it is paying for a feature that was supposed to come with the phone) Some folks have resorted to hacking their phones just to have GPS access: www.intomobile.com/2007/11/26/unlock-your-samsung-blackjack-iis-integrated-gps-receiver-to-work-outside-of-telenav.html

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 50 + 17?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.