Free Newsletter
UPDATED: AT&T says E911 requirements delaying 3G Microcell deployments
Free newsletter via e-mail
Tools
AT&T told AppleInsider that it is expanding its 3G MicroCell femtocell deployment into its second test market in Raleigh, N.C., today, but that further progress in deploying the femtocell solution may be delayed by other issues, including E911 requirements.
AT&T has requested clarification on the E911 laws to make sure that any new products such as the femtocell meet the government requirements. Existing laws require AT&T's cellular call towers to track the position of 911 callers either by using tower triangulation or the phone's internal GPS, enabling the network to report the caller's current position to the "Public Safety Answering Point" where 911 operators handle calls. Femtocells either have the GPS receiver incorporated into them or the provider locks them into a location.
Last week AT&T's revealed three price packages being offered to AT&T MicroCell femtocell customers in the company's trial area of Charlotte, N.C. Customers who have AT&T wireless service can pay an extra $20 per month for the MicroCell product. Customers who have both AT&T wireless and another AT&T service, such as landline phone service or Internet, can pay $10 per month for the device. Triple-play customers (those with wireless, landline and Internet) can receive the femtocell for free.
According to an AT&T spokesman, these prices are for the trial offering and final pricing of the commercial product may be different.
UPDATE: Seth Bloom, spokesman for AT&T told FierceWireless that the company is not seeing clarification from the FCC regarding the 3G MicroCell deployment in general nor is it seeking clarification regarding e911 issues as it relates to femtocells. The 3G Microcell complies with all FCC e911 requirements and the trials in Charlotte and Raleigh are going smoothly.
For more:
- see this AppleInsider post
- see this Local Tech Wire article
Related Articles:
AT&T reveals more femtocell details
AT&T reportedly nearing femtocell 'soft launch'
Is there a business case for femtocells?
AT&T targeting femto launch for this year
Comments
Posted by Deadcellzones.com | September 28, 2009 - 1:16pm
Carriers still have too many dead zones where e911 services will simply not work. For public safety reasons the FCC should be mandating that carriers address this issue first and require them to have more transparency. Deadcellzones.com has a database of over 100,000+ locations where cell phone users could be compromised in an emergency.
http://www.deadzones.com/2009/09/fcc-should-mandate-more-e911.html
Posted by Anonymous | September 28, 2009 - 4:06pm
Dead zones are not directly related to 911 service. The technology accounts for "dead zones" by using best signal when attempting a 911 call. For those who have actually made a 911 call, the phone goes into "emergency mode" which mean the call can then go out on the best signal from whatever carrier. This accounts for the FCC mandate for service and prioritization of emergency calls. There are other mechanism, but i digress. Dead zones are carrier specific, but 911 calls are not, they are best signal which means all like carriers, ie Verizon sub with a bad Verizon signal could put the emergency call up on a better Sprint signal or vice-versa.
Comments (2) | Post a comment