Free Newsletter
Verizon challenges handset exclusivity claims
Free newsletter via e-mail
Tools
Verizon Wireless is taking issue with comments by Cellular South to Congress over the alleged damage caused by exclusive handset arrangements, claiming that the rural carrier is misrepresenting its position on the issue. The tussle between the wireless behemoth and the small carrier comes as a Senate subcommittee is looking into whether exclusivity deals between carriers and handset makers harm consumers.
Verizon is alleging that Cellular South did not present all of the facts surrounding its position on the issue in testimony on May 7 before the House Telecommunications Subcommittee, according to a Telephony article. At that hearing, Cellular South said that large carriers were unfairly locking up handsets in exclusivity deals.
Verizon said Cellular South failed to mention that Verizon had recently offered to reduce the duration of its handset exclusivity contracts with LG and Samsung in a bid to help rural wireless carriers get the phones faster. Verizon made the the offer to the Associated Carrier Group (ACG), which represents 25 CDMA carriers that have a combined 2.6 million subscribers. The largest carrier in the group is Cellular South.
In March, Cellular South wrote in a memo to ACG members that Verizon's policy was a positive step that would give ACG members and wireless customers more choice. A Cellular South spokeswoman could not be reached for comment at deadline.
The Senate Commerce Committee's subcommittee on communications, technology and the Internet is to hold a hearing today to look into the issue. Earlier this week, four senators from the subcommittee asked the FCC to probe deeper into the matter.
For more
- see this Telephony article
Related Articles:
Senators urge FCC to probe handset exclusivity deals
For rural carriers, Verizon offers to reduce exclusivity time for LG, Samsung phones
Lawmakers debate iPhone-like exclusivity deals, wireless contract disputes
Report: Apple talking to Verizon about iPhone
AT&T's Stephenson eyes prolonging iPhone exclusivity, will refresh focus on wireless
Comments
Posted by Anonymous | June 17, 2009 - 12:16pm
Verizon made a verbal statement but would never allow the agreement to be put in writing. They have told the handset manufacturers (samsung and LG) to never follow up on any so called agreement unless they receive it in writing from Verizon. Which they have failed and refused to do. Therefore Verizon's intent has never been to allow this agreement to take place. Our country was built on healthy competition, the American people are better served by the presence of competition. Verizon should be held accountable to the truth.
Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 - 7:34am
What about AT&T and the iPhone? That's just ridiculous that you have to put up with their shoddy, slow 2G network to use the iPhone. Why are AT&T and Verizon scared of competition? Because they've been overcharging consumers for years. I switch to Sprint and have found their network to be just as good for voice and better for data and save a ton of money.
Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2009 - 11:20am
Do you have proof of your accusations or are you speculating.
Comments (3) | Post a comment