Will LightSquared succeed with its LTE ambitions?
In the nearly two decades that I've been writing about the wireless industry, I've witnessed some very high-profile business failures (Iridium and Metricom, to name a few). Many of these flameouts had a few things in common. First, they thought they could build a network from scratch and--despite fierce competition from existing players--attract enough customers to offset the billions in infrastructure costs they would incur.
Secondly, they thought they could beat the existing service providers at their own game by offering consumers a better alternative. Iridium's plan was to launch a constellation of low-Earth orbit satellites that would blanket the earth with coverage and provide global voice and data services to globe-trotting executives that needed global coverage. Metricom's plan was to offer wireless data service using small repeaters installed on light poles and compete with the wireline DSL and cable modem companies.
So you can imagine my skepticism when I first learned of private-equity firm Harbinger Capital Partners and its plans to launch a nationwide wholesale LTE network (dubbed LightSquared) that some estimate will cost between $6 billion and $10 billion to build. Like the examples above, LightSquared believes it can build out this costly network from scratch and attract wholesale customers, which will then resell mobile broadband services using the LightSquared network. And company executives believe LightSquared can attract enough wholesale customers (they have said they're talking to at least 30 possible wholesale clients) to justify the company's buildout expenses. And like the examples above, LightSquared also believes it can beat existing service providers (like Clearwire (NASDAQ:CLWR), AT&T (NYSE:T) and Verizon (NYSE:VZ)) at their game by providing better coverage and better quality of service.
But LightSquared likely will be a bit late to the game--it plans to cover 100 million people by year-end 2012 as opposed to competitor Clearwire, which plans to cover 120 million people by year-end 2010.
Will LightSquared succeed? I spoke with Chief Marketing Officer Frank Boulben and I have to admit, he talks a good game. He knows the industry, he knows the technology and he understand the importance of building an ecosystem to support LightSquared's ambitious plans.
For more on LightSquared's plans (and the industry's reaction), check out my feature article here. I've talked to various players in the industry about this 4G upstart and I think you may find their responses interesting.
I remain skeptical--but also hopeful. I'd like to see a new upstart make it in the 4G space. But if history is any indication of the future, LightSquared has a tough road ahead. --Sue
Comments
I agree with skeptical view...but I hope they can win the game.. I'm the one dreaming the world every consumer elec. can be connected to network..not just cellphone..I believe, Lightsquared's model would make faster this...
Hi Sue,
I have been following all your articles ever since I came to know about the existence of fiercewireless website...I must say that they are really informative compared to other articles I have read at blogs and sections of some other websites...I am currently working for a telecom company as a Tech and I always wanted to know more abt these 4G technologies(Wimax and LTE)...Like when Clearwire says we have this much spectrum what do they exactly mean technically in terms of bits and bytes data-wise?I would really appreciate if you could suggest me some good telecom books from a good publisher that would make my concepts/fundamentals very clear as to how this whole Spectrum things work,how all the layers work etc?Thank you very much!
I think its a great idea! I thinks operators will jump on board or one of them will end up buying the network and spectrum as things progress.
Sanjay, Spectrum will give the operator more bandwidth to use. Depending on the type of technology used will determine the data rates applied and supported.
As a former Iridium employee and collegue of several Metricomers< the one thing that both companies succeeded in was that both technologies work (in Iridium's case) and worked (in Metricom's case)as designed. Both are engineering marvels. Where both fell short was on the management and planning side. Let's hope that LS has better luck and that tower/building owners are scraping their leftover waste off their property a decade later.



SHARE
WITH:
Comments (4) | Post a comment