“When a foreign government pursues censorship policies in a manner that favours domestic internet companies, this goes against basic international trade principles of non-discrimination and maintaining a level playing field,” he said.
When a government disrupted an internet service completely, it was “restricting trade well beyond what would be required even if it had a legitimate public policy justification,” Davidson said.
He called for new trade rules to tackle the barriers to information flow and for the US government “to use trade agreements, trade tools and trade diplomacy to promote the free flow of information.”
In other testimony to Congress, US domain registrar Go Daddy said it would no longer register .cn domains because of new government requirements.
General counsel Christine Jones said Chinese officials had begun requesting photo identification and signatures of its customers and to obtain documentation for individuals who had registered a domain.
“We made the decision that we didn’t want to act as an agent of the Chinese government,” she said.
Meanwhile, China Unicom said it would dump
Google as a search partner on Android phones, FT.com reported.