OECD report says US mobile usage among most costly

A new report from the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) said cellphone users in the US, Canada and Spain have the highest cellphone bills in the world, while those in Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden have the lowest. However, US wireless trade group CTIA vehemently disagreed with the report's conclusions, and said the group's statistics rely on a flawed methodology.

One of the reasons users in the US and Canada pay high bills is that, unlike in Europe, customers in North America often have to pay to receive phone calls. "You have to have a certain income level to afford it," Taylor Reynolds, an economist with the OECD's Telecommunications and Internet Policy division, told the Wall Street Journal.

However, Miguel Garzon, a spokesperson for Telefónica, told the Journal that "it is very difficult to compare the different types of plans in different countries."

CTIA ratcheted up the criticism, arguing that the report's international comparisons didn't work and were "built on flawed assumptions."

Specifically, CTIA said that buried on page 275 of the OECD report was the following item: "It is important to note again that the OECD calling pattern in the basket can be significantly different than common calling profiles in a specific country." The OECD classified a "high-usage" user as someone who had made 1,680 outgoing voice calls, or 2,952 minutes, but noted that US users average 9,600 minutes of voice calls (combined incoming and outgoing) per year.

"In this case the basket provides the cost of buying exactly the calls and messages in the OECD basket rather than what may be considered a 'typical' bundle in the market," the report said.

The CTIA seized on this and said it showed that the profiles used in the OECD report do not reflect the reality of US cellphone usage. "Only by picking such unrepresentative 'representative' call packages, could the OECD have reached such a result," CTIA said in a statement.

In response to CTIA, OECD's Reynolds said the report notes that minutes of consumption per year in the US are high relative to other countries.

Further, he said the baskets do not claim to represent any specific country's exact consumption level, and should not favor any one country at all. "To achieve this we hold a meeting every two-three years with operators and telecommunication regulators from around the OECD to discuss usage patterns in their particular countries and find a way to define a 'typical' low-, medium- and high-use pattern for the OECD," he said. "Our last meeting was in July 2009 and we had good representation from the US.

"The correct way to interpret the Communication Outlook data is to say these are the prices for the same consumption pattern across all OECD countries," Reynolds said. "We select the plan in each country which is cheapest for someone with this exact calling and texting pattern and see how much it costs to replicate in each county. Based on these precise patterns, prices are cheapest in Northern Europe and relatively more expensive in North America."

Read more

This report originally appeared in FierceWireless

 

Suggested Articles

Wireless operators can provide 5G services with spectrum bands both above and below 6 GHz—but that doesn't mean that all countries will let them.

Here are the stories we’re tracking today.

The 5G Mobile Network Architecture research project will implement two 5G use cases in real-world test beds.