Apple's Schiller claims Samsung's alleged copying made marketing iPhone more difficult

A senior Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) executive said Samsung Electronics' alleged copying of Apple's products subsequently made selling the iPhone and iPad more difficult.

In testimony in the retrial of patent infringement claims between Apple and Samsung, Phil Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of worldwide marketing, said Samsung's devices, particularly its smartphones that looked like the iPhone, made it "much harder" for Apple to set itself apart and market its gadgets.

"It's much harder to create demand, and people question our innovation and design skills like people never used to," Schiller said, according to Reuters, adding that Samsung "weakened the world view of Apple as this great designer and innovator."

"This was an incredibly important time," he said, according to CNET. "As this [infringement] has been occurring, it's harder for us to get new customers and bring them into our ecosystem."

Schiller also said the iPhone was a "bet the company product," and that now the entire company works on it in some way. Apple's iPhone line brings in the lion's share of the company's revenue and profit.

One of the patents at issue is Apple's "pinch-to-zoom" touchscreen command. According to CNET, Michael Wagner, an accountant and lawyer hired by Samsung, said there's no evidence from either company that shows consumers bought Samsung gadgets because they wanted to get that touch-screen feature, negating any lost profits Apple is hoping to claw back from Samsung. "I believe people bought these phones for other features," Wagner said, including AMOLED screens, faster processors and LTE.

Apple's campaign against Samsung, and, by extension, Google's (NASDAQ:GOOG) Android, led to the company's $1 billion courtroom victory against Samsung's Android smartphones in the summer of 2012, though the damages in the ruling were slashed by $450.5 million after U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh ruled the jury had erred in calculating the damages. Koh, who is overseeing the retrial, said on Friday that witness testimony will likely conclude on Monday, with closing arguments coming Tuesday.

Last week during opening arguments, Apple asked for $380 million in damages, and Samsung countered and said it is only required to pay $52 million.

The retrial, as AllThingsD notes, is not centering as much on different perspectives on innovation as the original trial did, as is really all about money at this point. However, it comes against the backdrop of a larger continuing fight between Apple and Android device makers.

After years of reverse-engineering electronics gadgets and looking for infringing products, the Rockstar patent consortium owned by Apple, Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Ericsson (NASDAQ:ERIC), Sony, EMC and BlackBerry (NASDAQ:BBRY) recently filed a battery of lawsuits against Google and Android manufacturers like Samsung, HTC, Huawei and others. Rockstar paid $4.5 billion for the 6,000 patents that bankrupt Nortel Networks offered up for auction in 2011. Rockstar is primarily backed by Apple, which paid $2.6 billion into the effort.

For more:
- see this CNET article
- see this Reuters article
- see this separate CNET article
- see this AllThingsD article

Related Articles:
Nokia, Samsung extend patent-licensing deal for 5 years
Rockstar, backed by Apple, blasts Google and Android handset makers with patent lawsuits
Samsung vows to fight Obama's dismissal of import ban on iPhone, iPad
Report: Apple, Samsung holding negotiations to settle patent disputes
Samsung scores U.S. import ban on older Apple iPhones, iPads
Samsung confirms that Apple could get more than $1.05B in new patent trial
Judge cuts damages in Apple/Samsung patent case by $450M

FREE DAILY NEWSLETTER

Like this story? Subscribe to FierceWireless!

The Wireless industry is an ever-changing world where big ideas come along daily. Our subscribers rely on FierceWireless as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data on this increasingly competitive marketplace. Sign up today to get wireless news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Suggested Articles

AT&T has shifted its Cricket prepaid brand to a 100% authorized retailer model, according to Wave7 Research.

The FCC decided to extend the timeline for responding to Huawei's application for review until December 11.

All operators are trying to understand the intersection between their networks and hyperscale networks. But who gets the lion's share of the revenue?