California judge says Sprint must pay $73M in ETF case

A California judge has ruled that Sprint Nextel must pay $73 million in refunds to its former customers in a lawsuit over early termination fees.  However, a Sprint spokesman says that the ruling is tentative and the company has two weeks to come up with a response to this decision. 

Consumer advocates are calling this preliminary decision a victory and saying that early termination fees unfairly restrict consumers from switching service. Wireless operators, meanwhile, say that ETFs are necessary because they subsidize a portion of the cost of the device and need to recoup those expenses.

This court decision comes at a time when the FCC is considering a nationwide ETF policy for carriers. Verizon has advocated that the commission adopt rules that are similar to what the operator has in place. For example, carriers should offer opt-out or trial periods for new contracts; provide pro-rated ETFs; and offer no ETFs for contract renewals unless the consumer gets a new device as part of the deal.

Verizon recently settled a similar suit for $21 million. The carrier didn't admit to any wrongdoing but said that $21 million, which is the maximum amount it was liable for, will be doled out to plaintiffs and will cover attorney's fees. 

For more:
- read this story

Related articles:
Verizon settles ETF suit for $21M
Verizon to FCC: nationwide ETF policy is best
FCC provides some insight into ETF rules

Suggested Articles

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) told T-Mobile and Sprint that they can't begin the merger of California operations just yet.

That’s a push back from the mid-April reopen target Apple appeared hopeful for just last week.

MTN Consulting says the industry consensus is that 5G will double to triple energy consumption for mobile operators, once networks scale.