FCC slams Sprint for falsely collecting millions in Lifeline funds

Sprint store
The inactive Lifeline customers Sprint was getting paid for represent a whopping 30% of the carrier's Lifeline subscriber base. (Monica Alleven/FierceWireless)

The FCC on Tuesday revealed that Sprint falsely collected “tens of millions” in subsidies from the government’s Lifeline program, with the carrier getting paid for 885,000 subscribers even though they were inactive and not using the service.

The Lifeline program is meant to make phone and internet service available for low-income consumers, but has been riddled with fraud and abuse. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai called Sprint’s actions “outrageous.”

Participating providers on average receive a $9.25 monthly subsidy for each Lifeline subscriber, which is supposed to be passed on to the customer, making the service free to consumers.

Sponsored by Nokia

Webinar: Capture customer value with agile operations in 5G

This webinar looks at how CSPs can gain the agility to port use cases and services from one customer or segment to another, quickly and seamlessly. In the webinar we will examine what agility means for concrete services and use cases, how we can quickly adapt a service for multiple different industries, how catalog based service orchestration and DevOps priniciples bring agility to operations and more.

RELATED: FCC to combat Lifeline fraud with new program rules

In Sprint’s case, the carrier was falsely collecting taxpayer dollars for consumers that it did not actually provide services to and who did not use any voice minutes or data. The 885,000 inactive Lifeline customers Sprint claimed and was getting paid for represent a whopping 30% of Sprint’s Lifeline subscriber base and a full 10% of the entire Lifeline program’s subscribers, according to the FCC.

“It’s outrageous that a company would claim millions of taxpayer dollars for doing nothing,” Pai said in a statement. “This shows a careless disregard for program rules and American taxpayers. I have asked our Enforcement Bureau to investigate this matter to determine the full extent of the problem and to propose an appropriate remedy.”

Sprint’s abuse was uncovered by an investigation by the Oregon Public Utility Commission, and the FCC said the carrier’s action violates the Lifeline program’s key “non-usage” rule, which is meant to prevent waste, fraud and abuse.

Exactly what Sprint’s punishment will be remains to be seen. In 2018 the FCC proposed a $63 million fine against wireless reseller American Broadband & Telecommunications for claiming funding for more than 42,000 ineligible Lifeline accounts in one month.

RELATED: Consumer watchdog group urges FCC to crack down harder on Lifeline abusers

Abuse of the program, where carriers enroll duplicate or non-existent subscribers, or like Sprint submit claims for individuals not using their Lifeline service, is not a new problem. According to the FCC, the Lifeline program has an improper payment rate of 18.5%.

In August Pai circulated a draft order with the aim to strengthen the program’s enrollment and reimbursement verification. The FCC’s Office of Inspector General in April found that a significant portion of fraud happened during the subscriber enrollment process.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) in 2017 was unable to confirm the eligibility of about 36% of Lifeline subscribers, or 1.2 million individuals, that it reviewed.

In 2013 major carriers were required to shed a significant number of Lifeline subscribers after stricter policies were implemented by the FCC in 2012.

Suggested Articles

Huawei’s smartphone unit shipments in the first quarter of this year were just shy of 49 million, the lowest figure for eight quarters.

AT&T’s 4G LTE network ranked fastest and most consistent, while T-Mobile’s 5G coverage dwarfed that of its two competitors.

Rosenblatt analyst Ryan Koontz said it’s a “$1 billion opportunity that Nokia may lose” and that “these sorts of decisions only come every 7-10 years.