Judge: AT&T's wireless contract is "unconscionable"

A U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth District ruled that AT&T's arbitration clause, which claims any AT&T wireless subscriber cannot file class action suits against the company, is "unconscionable." Judge Stephen Reinhardt wrote: "We hold that the waiver is unconscionable, and, thus, unenforceable, and that the invalidation of the contract provision is not preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act." The ruling allows an AT&T customer, Kenneth Shroyer to bring a class-action suit against the carrier for alleged breach of contract and untrue advertising following AT&T's acquisition of Cingular Wireless, according to the suit.

These arbitration clauses are somewhat common and their legality has so far been decided on a state-by-state basis, but the Ninth Court's decision may lead to a Supreme Court case that could decide the matter nationwide. AT&T's clause forced the customer to waive his or her right to a trial by jury or have a judge hear the arguments. Instead, customers are instructed to settle the matter in a less costly arbitration process.

For more on the clause:
- read this article CNET


Like this story? Subscribe to FierceWireless!

The Wireless industry is an ever-changing world where big ideas come along daily. Our subscribers rely on FierceWireless as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data on this increasingly competitive marketplace. Sign up today to get wireless news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.