Net neutrality amendment fails in committee

Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee rejected the hotly contested amendment that would have governed Net neutrality--the term that has come to represent the concept of an Internet where no traffic is given preferential treatment. The Net neutrality issue has been debated since broadband network operators have voiced their desire to charge content players to deliver content over their networks to help pay for network improvements. Then there was a lot of scare mongering among opponents who said that these network operators could simply block certain traffic or deliberately slow service for those who don't pay up. There are a lot of issues surrounding Net neutrality, and it is complex business writing something like that into law. First off, how do you define it? As Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) said, "It's kind of like pornography: You know it when you see it."

To read more about the the Net neutrality issue:
- take a look at this report from CNET

Sponsored by ADI

What if we were always connected? With the help of our advanced wireless technology, even people in the most remote places could always be in touch.

What if there were no ocean, desert, mountain or event that could ever keep us from telling our stories, sharing discoveries or asking for help? ADI’s next-gen communications technology could keep all of us connected.

Suggested Articles

Is there a better mousetrap in terms of macrocell deployment? Facebook Connectivity thinks so.

Nokia said joint research with Telefónica confirms that 5G networks are up to 90% more energy efficient than 4G.

The Senate Commerce Committee voted 14-12 along party lines to move forward on President Trump’s nomination of Nathan Simington to the FCC.